« Dr. Sam Epstein's Letter to Harvard | Main | A very important number. »

Harvard Grads Criticize University's "Investigation" of Chester Douglass

Thursday, August 31, 2006 at 12:25PM
Posted by Registered CommenterF.A.N.

Harvard's failure to provide any expanation (after a 13 month investigation!) for Chester Douglass' misrepresentation of research linking fluoride to chidhood bone cancer is causing consternation among a growing number of Harvard grads.

 According to an Aug 29th letter from Dr. Peter Orris, a noted environmental health specialist:

"As a Harvard Graduate ('67) who has some experience with controversial environmental issues, I am particularly concerned with this all too brief report on Professor Douglass's activities."

Orris notes that Harvard's statement

"does not give us (anyone outside of the investigation room) any idea as to what evidence was evaluated. We are therefore left with the uncomfortable situation of trusting that this committee did an adequate job. This discomfort is amplified when the group that brought the concern to Harvard's attention originally denies having been contacted or interviewed."

 According to another Harvard grad, Robert Weissman (editor of the corporate watchdog Multinational Monitor), Harvard's statement was "a disappointment. It gave no explanation as to why the evidence presented was dismissed and Professor Douglass's behavior considered acceptable."

 Weissman called upon Harvard's President, Derek Bok, to issue a "fuller and more open public accounting."

 A list of other Harvard grads who have written to Harvard to express their displeasure with Harvard's "investigation" are included below.

To send your own letter to Harvard, click here.

---

Harvard Graduates Speaking Out:

Phillip Allen, MD, Harvard Medical School, '54

Jon Bower, graduate, Harvard Business School, '86

Albert Burgstahler, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Chemistry, Kansas University; Editor of the journal Fluoride; Co-author, "Fluoridation: The Great Dilemma"; MA '50, PhD '53.

David Egilman, PhD, MPH,  graduate of Harvard School of Public Health, '82.

Naomi Flack, EdM, Harvard Graduate School of Education, '64
 
Roy Flack, LLB, Harvard Law School, '64; MBA, Harvard Business School, '66

Laura Haight, Harvard College '84

Antone G. Jacobson, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Harvard College, '51

Dr Emily A. Kane, recent mayoral commissioner to evaluate risk/benefit of fluoridation of municipal water in Juneau, AK, author Managing Menopause Naturally, Bastyr University '92  (doctorate, Naturopathic Medicine), Harvard University '78

Stephen M. Koral, Dentist,  AM, Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, '70; DMD, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, '80.

Kathryn Lee, EdM, Harvard Graduate School of Education, '94

Peter Orris, MD, MPH, Professor and Chief of Service Occupational and Environmental Medicine University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Harvard University '67.

Richard J. Perry, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology, St. Lawrence University, Harvard College '64

Eleanor Prentiss, BA, Harvard's Extension, '67

Richard Shames, MD, author "Feeling Fat, Fuzzy or Frazzled?" Harvard College, '67

Caroline Snyder, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Rochester Institute of Technology,  MA, Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, '56, PhD,  '66.

Brian Tokar, author "Gene Traders", "The Green Alternative" and "Earth for Sale", MA Biophysics, Harvard Graduate School for Arts and Sciences, '81

Robert Weissman, Editor of Multinational Monitor, Director of Essential Action, co-author, "Corporate Predators" and "On the Rampage", Harvard College '88-'89, Harvard Law School '95.

Reader Comments (2)

It seems that the statement that "there is no significant increase in osteosarcomas in fluoridated cities" and the statement that "there is a robust association in boys 8-9 years age between fluoridated water and increased osteosarcoma" are both true. So both Douglass and Bassin are uttering truthful statements. It is very possible that only growing boys with high rates of osteoblastic activity and who have very little estrogen are most susceptible to artificial fluoride deposits in the bone. Calcium fluoride in bone, a living tissue, alters the properties of bone in lots of ways. Bone, unlike teeth, has no enamel. Hydroxyapetite releases calcium ions into blood regularly to maintain blood ionized calcium concentrations in a narrow fixed range at all times for proper heart beat and most other biological functions. This is bone's most important function, as a calcium reservoir. Secondarily, bones support limbs for walking and many other functions. But to find the truth, whether fluoride bone deposits sometimes cause osteosarcoma, with statistical significance is difficult when the most susceptible group is a subset of the entire population. The amazing thing is, just like the death at Hooper Bay Alaska [New Eng. J. Med 1994, 330:95] due to fluoridated water,those who promote fluoridation to "improve teeth tissue" are blinded into thinking that all other adverse effects, since statistically they are not readily detectable in the entire fluoridated population set usually, allow themselves to mentally agree to continue to unnatural fluoridation. Sacrificing problems, sometimes death, here and there in subsets is assumed to be 'doing whatever it takes' to get the job [of altering teeth tissue] done. But this rationale has never been in keeping with the mission of protecting public health.
August 17, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Richard Sauerheber
For three years I have been trying to get our Rochester Water Bureau to stop adding toxic waste to our drinking water.This toxic waste is recovered pollution from the phosphate fertilizer industry. It contains lead, arsenic, and mercury. Instead of disposing of the tons of this heavy-metal waste properly,the phosphate fertilizer industry SELLS it to our water bureaus. So we pay big money for poison to be forced on us.It is dangerous to infants, and harms diabetics and Kidney patients.No wonder so many of our population are sick!
August 21, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterNancy Watson Dean

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.