F.A.N.
In 2004, the Discovery Health channel in Canada aired the following forum on the risks/benefits of fluoride and fluoridation. The forum features Dr Euan Swan of the Canadian Dental Association, Dr. David Locker of the University of Toronto, and Dr. Paul Connett of Fluoride Action Network.
Reader Comments (4)
When will we be able to Protect ALL of our Citizens in North America from Corporations that are controlling our Governments?
Learn more about the deceit of so called 'fluoridation' by reading the just published book by Christopher Bryson entitled, "the fluoride deception". Ask for a copy at your local library or purchase the Book, online r local bookstore. Also, you can view a summation of what Bryson desribes using scientific investigation by turning on your speakers and going to: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7319752042352089988&q=fluoride+Bryson&hl=en
____
On March, 2006 a 'balanced' distinguished dozen group of Scientists on a National Research Council/National Academy of Science Panel, after 3-1/2 years of their intensely studying recent 'peer reviewed' published 'Fluoride' SCIENCE as related to possible health endangerment issued a 507 page REPORT in bound book format concerning ALL that they learned and concluded with 'Recommendations'. One essential Conclusion was that the current USA governmental set maximum established levels for fluoride in drinking water are NOT Protective especially of children from 'fluorsis', and lifetime 'Bone damage'and other bodily damage! You can read the entire Report 'FREE' on Internet, or purchase a copy by going to: http://nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571
After reading and better understanding the 2 documents shared above, you and ALL should conclude the current North American so called 'fluoridation' of our drinking waters is totally endangering millions of Americans, especially INFANTS/BABIES/CHILDREN; and that the Public Health systems are probably 'Criminally Negligent'! Governments' next moves should be to promptly SHUT DOWN ALL injection of any FLUORIDE containing compound into utility treated waters by water treatment plants in North America.
___
After Reading and Hearing the above 'scientifically based reports'...CALL and Write to your local USA Government & State Representatives sternly request to each to hold a Congressional Investigation into this 'entrenched ERROR' of 'fluoridation' and 'government sponsored Bodily Pollution' Scheme.
[Note: European, Asian and other non-English speaking nations have NEVER or long since Stopped the practice of 'fluoridation' as they listened to their Scientists speak the Truths of Dangers of Fluoridation.
___
NEVER SWALLOW ANY FLUORIDE !
____
Please SIGN the Petition Calling For a U.S. CONGRESSIONAL HEARING with those responsible for FLUORIDATION 'at the TOP' to Testify under Oath.
SIGN AT: http://www.powalliance.org/petition/
Health and dental authorities now admit that 32% of children in fluoridated areas now have some evidence of this toxicity showing as dental fluorosis.
Both these children were the first born of 2 different families and the subsequent children had normally erupting baby teeth and the oldest one's permanent teeth are normal.
During pregnancy, one daughter-in-law, mother of the 5 year old, was very aware of fluoride's effects and where possible avoided all sources by using fluoride-free water, fluoride-free toothpaste and eating organic during her pregnancy. What, then, was the source of this grandson's fluorosis??
I suggest the following hypothesis:
The mother, as a child, was exposed to excess fluoride which accumulated in her bones. During her late pregnancy period when the child often takes calcium from the mother to build bones and teeth, calcium began to leach from her bones along with the accumulated fluoride and was deposited in the fetus' bones and teeth.
The child was also born with a serious genetic defect (neurofibromitosis) which is unknown on either side of the family.
It is a fact that fluoride can affect DNA. Could this defect also be caused by fluoride's ability to damage genes?? Could this damage have occurred in very early pregnancy by the same mechanism (i.e., calciium-fluoride leaching from the mother's bones) as his dental defect?
One doctor, a pediatrician, we spoke to called the disease "rare" as being one in 200,000 births but qualified this by adding that it seems to be increasing. If it's this rare, it would be unlikely that any doctor would see more than one, if any, such patient in a lifetime practice. How did she, as a pediatrician, conclude that it is increasing?? The incidence of an inherited condition tends to remain constant through generations or die out if it kills early. If it increases doesn't this mean there is another means of propagation of this condition?