F.A.N. Discussion Forum > Bill to Congress
Why are you only against fluoride in water? What about the other chemicals that we know nothing about? Chlorine has never been tested to see if it helps our bodies right? They just say that it doesn't harm us because they don't see anything harmful, but at the same time aquatic and amphibious animals can die from too much exposure of it. Shouldn't the Bill be against ANY untested chemical? If it was just for Fluoride there would be loopholes in the Bill
April 13, 2008 |
Alex
Alex
Dumping toxic Fluoride litter into salt, is just as bad as it is in water.
Salt fluoridation is scientific fraud; it affects hundreds of millions of people in Europe, Latin America, the Caribbean and the Middle East; and it is a health disaster. Removing fluoride from salt will benefit everyone, and save the salt companies a lot of trouble. --> http://tinyurl.com/2fr58q
Fluoridation litter in any shape or form must be stopped!!!
Salt fluoridation is scientific fraud; it affects hundreds of millions of people in Europe, Latin America, the Caribbean and the Middle East; and it is a health disaster. Removing fluoride from salt will benefit everyone, and save the salt companies a lot of trouble. --> http://tinyurl.com/2fr58q
Fluoridation litter in any shape or form must be stopped!!!
April 14, 2008 |
Danny
Danny
Chlorine is bad for the thyroid but is way less damaging as fluoride, which is the most reactive of the halogens and nests itself in the body, especially if you do not actively try to remove it and if your nutrition is poor. While chlorine will even evaporate from water.Fluoride is definitely the worse followed by bromine.
April 21, 2008 |
Dora
Dora
